Ocarina problem.[]
Uh, there seems to be a problem here, claiming the game is better than Ocarina, which is a completely fan created statement. I am immediately getting rid of this.
Melanie Rachel Ravenswood 21:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Ahh but it is better than Ocarina.
- Good. Articles shouldn't be opinionated. - BattleFranky202 04:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Wait. Is orcarnia of time and twilight princess even in the same timeline?
- Yes... yes they are. There's a split timeline that was created at the end of Ocarina of Time, meaning all games excluding Minish Cap and Ocarina of Time take place in one timeline or the other. Because of this, all Zelda games are connected to Ocarina of Time, whereas Wind Waker might not be in the same timeline of Twilight Princess. Bentendo Talk
Wiki[]
This looks like the Wiki page. 76.126.15.78 19:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm assuming that you mean the Wikipedia page (there are thousands of Wiki's). But no, they each have completely different text. Bentendo Talk
Opinions[]
In the Zelda Community theories are one of the main debates (mostly timeline theories but never limited to that) so to have an part of an article be opinionated toward one side or another or not seeing all sides would be only a strike at the other side. When I saw that it said that the Twili were either the Gerudo or Majora's sorcerors then that goes against the idea that it is neither because their is really no proof to prove any legitimate links between the Twili and another Race. So leaving i ttheir the twili cant be classified as any race but itself. All in All what im trying to get at is we need to look at all parts of an argument. i have been looking around this wiki for a while and i really havent seen many things wrong such as this. But I am just pointing this out to help try and make the wiki better by referring to all sides of an theory when quoting or implying a theory(or similar argument).Ironknuckle1 20:06, December 2, 2010 (UTC)